or “What do those in front do that we might learn from?”
or “Who is behind us and why?”
or “Who is slipping backwards in the ratings, and, well what are they doing that we must avoid like the plague?”
Okay now we’ve got the title sorted, let’s see how the 15 year olds are doing around the world…
And more to the point – how the Kiwis are doing… *
2009 Programme for International Student Assessment — test scores | ||||||
# | Reading – Overall | Mathematics | Science | |||
1 | China: Shanghai | 556 | China: Shanghai | 600 | China: Shanghai | 575 |
2 | Korea | 539 | Singapore | 562 | Finland | 554 |
3 | Finland | 536 | Hong Kong | 555 | Hong Kong | 549 |
4 | Hong Kong | 533 | Korea | 546 | Singapore | 542 |
5 | Singapore | 526 | Chinese Taipei | 543 | Japan | 539 |
6 | Canada | 524 | Finland | 541 | Korea | 538 |
7 | New Zealand | 521 | Liechtenstein | 536 | New Zealand | 532 |
8 | Japan | 520 | Switzerland | 534 | Canada | 529 |
9 | Australia | 515 | Japan | 529 | Estonia | 528 |
10 | Netherlands | 508 | Canada | 527 | Australia | 527 |
11 | Belgium | 506 | Netherlands | 526 | Netherlands | 522 |
12 | Norway | 503 | China: Macao | 525 | Chinese Taipei | 520 |
13 | Estonia | 501 | New Zealand | 519 | Liechtenstein | 520 |
14 | Switzerland | 501 | Belgium | 515 | Germany | 520 |
15 | Iceland | 500 | Australia | 514 | Switzerland | 517 |
16 | Poland | 500 | Germany | 513 | United Kingdom | 514 |
17 | United States | 500 | Estonia | 512 | Slovenia | 512 |
18 | Liechtenstein | 499 | Iceland | 507 | China: Macao | 511 |
19 | Germany | 497 | Denmark | 503 | Poland | 508 |
20 | Sweden | 497 | Slovenia | 501 | Ireland | 508 |
21 | France | 496 | Norway | 498 | Belgium | 507 |
22 | Ireland | 496 | France | 497 | Hungary | 503 |
23 | Chinese taipei | 495 | Slovak Republic | 497 | United States | 502 |
PISA average : | 501 | |||||
24 | Denmark | 495 | Austria | 496 | Norway | 500 |
PISA average : | 496 | |||||
25 | Hungary | 494 | Poland | 495 | Czech Republic | 500 |
26 | United Kingdom | 494 | Sweden | 494 | Denmark | 499 |
PISA average : | 493 | |||||
Reading – Overall | Mathematics | Science | ||||
27 | Portugal | 489 | Czech Republic | 493 | France | 498 |
28 | China: Macao | 487 | United Kingdom | 492 | Iceland | 496 |
29 | Italy | 486 | Hungary | 490 | Sweden | 495 |
30 | Latvia | 484 | Luxembourg | 489 | Austria | 494 |
31 | Greece | 483 | United States | 487 | Latvia | 494 |
32 | Slovenia | 483 | Ireland | 487 | Portugal | 493 |
So, Out of 65 countries worldwide, New Zealand is 7th for Reading and Science, and 13th for Maths.
Now, where are the UK and USA – because we are following in their footsteps with Charter Schools, so they must be good, right?
Maths
- USA – 31st
- UK – 28th
- Oh, right, so 18 and 15 places behind New Zealand. Yeah, well, okay, but what about science?
Science
- USA – 16th
- UK – 23rd.
- Where was NZ again? 7th? Sorry did you say seventh? So nine places above the USA and 16 places above the UK. Again, we beat them by miles. Hmmmm. And reading?
Reading
- USA – 17th
- UK – 26th
- Remind me again where NZ was? 7th. So 10 places ahead of Uncle Sam and 19 ahead of the Poms.
Okay I am clearly missing something here…
Why would we want to copy the faulty ideology of countries we are thrashing hands down?
If we want to improve even further, what about maybe paying attention to one of the countries consistently above us, instead?
Anyone?
Anyone?
Beuller???
* Sorry the table was so big, but I had to make it that long to keep the USA and UK visible there near the bottom…
http://ourtimes.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/oecd-education-rankings/
So would the blog poster like to inform the audience of your experience living, working and teaching children in the UK and the US? Both of these countries are far different to New Zealand. There are so many factors involved in these ratings, they are naive at best and ludicrous at worst.Many Charter schools in the UK have been wildly successful, the problem in our education system isn’t the introduction of charter schools. The problem is wide ranging… socio-economic, very poor pay and ridiculous working conditions for teachers (paperwork, paperwork, paperwork).
LikeLike
It’s kind of irrelevant what my own experience is – it has no bearing on my ability to analyse and comment on the report. The OECD’s PISA scores are well respected and oft repeated throughout the OECD as measures of various socio-economic factors. The problems in NZ are not nearly as bad as the government makes out – however, I totally agree that they are primarily socio-economic. Charter schools do not have a good record on many levels, not least of all regarding inclusion and teachers’ working conditions. I cannot for the life of me see how they will improve anything at all. If all schools were given the same freedoms charters will be given, that would make more sense. We should be looking to Finland, not to places slipping backwards. If you believe charters will help NZ, I truly would like to see some detailed and well researched information to back that up. I am always willing to consider new information and learn from it.
LikeLike